The presence of my statement bothered you because it inconvenienced your imperative. I didn't need to remind anyone of anything. Now to quote you: "Leave me alone." There is a reason I did not replied to your after you reached a point in your tirade. No, it's your pointless and contemptuous style is the upsetting part of your performance. And here you are.Īnd kept commenting "leave me alone" to people who also don't understand why you keep arguing about your need to remind people to such a trivial thing. You added nothing to the discussionĪll I said was not to make a mountain out of molehill about it. We know, and when the time comes, we see if it's the same or not. We knew, before you felt the burning need to tell us that what a site has been done for 2 years, may not be true for the 3rd year. So, again, let's not take this too seriously. I'm monitoring soruces that are already hinting at the next day's games. It doesn't make sense to fight over it.ĮDIT: For the record, I wouldn't be so quick to say there's a lack of leaks for this year's event either. There are no guarantees.īut somehow that possibility escapes you and the suggestion of such upsets you, why do you expend your energy upon this? All I'm saying is I'd rather not hoist my own petard, that past events have shaped the lessons learned. I have it in mind because I also have had experience of Epic changing things, and they have done so a few times before and have such a right. How one simple slice of advice upsets you to reduce it to "fortune cookie wisdom", when there's a common associated saying, "don't count your chickens before they hatch." Whether I used either, the sentiment is the same. I don't know what you mean by saying "you can't always expect the expected" as that's not accurate nor what I'm saying here at all. I don't know why knowing the games upfront invalidates the fact that packaging was I would love to be wrong if people did that. This is why people should be looking these things up. It's not exact, but it doesn't discount the possibility that the leak was discovered before the event started, and that is still no basis of saying that the leaks happened after the event. FWIW however, the tweet admits the guy received that from a source from several hours prior. The 2020 link was posted about the same day the event was underway. A whole WEEK apart! FallenKal was completely overconfident in his point to be dismissive and failed to do actual research so he could distort historical facts, and still came out completely wrong. The 2021 event wouldn't start until the 16th. The Reddit thread was started on the 9th of December, contains several links to articles published on that same day, the second link of which I put up was one of them. If you don't feel like clicking the links, I'll save you time. Please use better sources than an ongoing thread that started in November that year. They posted the leaks after the first day on SG NOTE: deals back to weekly on Dec 29 2022. NOTE: games update daily at 11 am EST from to Dec 29 2022. NOTE: these games will be claimable for 24 hours ONLY unlike normal freebies that last a week. If you are looking for the past deals/discussion you can find it hereįor the end of the year, Epic will giveaway a game every day from December 15 to Dec 29 (then back to weekly): So I'm making the move over to a new thread since the whole table/description was getting unwieldy. Here is link to that thread if you want a headstart: (will still post today but will close this thread out within the week) It has been a pleasure doing the last two years of Epic freebies with you all! This discussion thread will close at the end of this year. Once they have a new thread up and running, I will post a link to it in the top post as well as a comment (They may also post a link as well). NOTE: At the end of this year (2022) I will be passing the torch over to ipax11.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |